Meta Fined Record $1.3 Billion by EU Regulators for Data Transfer Violations

Meta, formerly known as Facebook, has been slapped with a historic fine of 1.2 billion euros ($1.3 billion) by European privacy regulators due to violations related to the transfer of European Union user data to the United States. The decision comes as a result of a case brought forward by Austrian privacy campaigner Max Schrems, who argued that the existing framework for transferring EU citizen data to America failed to protect Europeans from U.S. surveillance adequately.

The fine imposed on Meta sets a new record for breaching the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The previous highest penalty was a 746 million euros fine imposed on e-commerce giant Amazon for GDPR violations in 2021. The substantial amount reflects the severity of the infringement and sends a strong message to technology companies regarding the importance of safeguarding user data.

The European Court of Justice had already invalidated the Privacy Shield, the latest mechanism allowing the legal transfer of personal data between the U.S. and the EU, in 2020. Despite this ruling, Meta, under scrutiny by the Irish Data Protection Commission, continued to send the personal data of European citizens to the United States, thereby infringing the GDPR.

Meta had been employing standard contractual clauses, an alternative mechanism approved by the European Commission, to facilitate data transfers between the EU and the U.S. However, the Irish regulator deemed these clauses insufficient in addressing the risks to the fundamental rights and freedoms of data subjects, as highlighted by the European Court of Justice.

As part of its decision, the Irish Data Protection Commission has ordered Meta to suspend any future transfer of personal data to the United States within a five-month period. This directive aims to protect the privacy rights of EU citizens while pushing Meta to reassess its data transfer practices.

In response to the fine, Meta has announced its intention to appeal the decision and the accompanying penalties. In a joint blog post, Meta’s President of Global Affairs, Nick Clegg, and Chief Legal Officer, Jennifer Newstead, expressed their disagreement with the decision, citing potential harm to the millions of people who rely on Meta’s services on a daily basis. They plan to seek a stay with the courts, aiming to pause the implementation deadlines and mitigate the immediate impact of the fine.

The repercussions of this case extend beyond Meta itself, as it highlights the ongoing efforts between the EU and the United States to establish a new data transfer mechanism. Last year, the two parties reached an agreement in principle regarding a new framework for cross-border data transfers. However, the implementation of this new pact has yet to take effect. Meta is now hopeful that the EU-U.S. data privacy agreement will be ratified before the Irish regulator’s deadlines, enabling them to continue their services without disruption or negative consequences for users.

The outcome of Meta’s appeal and the broader discussions surrounding data privacy and protection will undoubtedly shape the future landscape of international data transfers and the responsibilities of technology companies in handling user information. As privacy concerns continue to gain prominence, regulatory authorities are expected to remain vigilant in enforcing data protection laws to ensure the rights and freedoms of individuals are respected in an increasingly digital world.

Skip to content